VAT is added in the first case and the buyer does not have the right
to deduct input VAT, and in the second case, VAT is added and the
buyer has the right to deduct input VAT. Defining these transactions
has caused quite a lot of confusion, as the sale of goods or services
and the transfer of an enterprise or a part thereof have completely
different results from the standpoint of VAT. In many cases,
taxpayers have tried to reclassify the sales of goods as the transfer
of an enterprise in order to avoid paying VAT. At the same time,
there have been disputes of an opposite nature where the tax
authority reassesses the activity of an enterprise and claims that
sale of goods is actually nothing more than a transfer of the
company. The issue often lies in details, and a wrong interpretation
of them can create a significant tax risk. The Supreme Court has
repeatedly taken a stand on this. As the Value Added Tax Act is
relatively laconic when it comes to the transfer of an enterprise,
then the case law of the Supreme Court is an important source of
additional information for the taxpayer, which they can use to reduce
their risks when concluding transactions.
I will give a short overview of the first such position of the
Supreme Court in this matter1,
i.e. whether and when a transaction constitutes the transfer of an
enterprise or a part thereof, or when it is just an ordinary sale of
goods. Those who would like to take a closer look at said ruling can
find it on the website of the Supreme Court. I will highlight the
most important positions below. What must certainly be kept in mind
is that the Supreme Court has made many more judgments about this
issue which detail its present position. However, the basic principle
is highlighted in the ruling discussed below.
The Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court points out that the circumstances of specific transactions as well as the previous and subsequent conduct of the enterprises must be analysed when the transfer of an enterprise or a part thereof is assessed. The significant criteria to be considered when the transfer of an enterprise is assessed are, among others:
Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court found that these criteria
carry a different weight in the case of enterprises of different
types. All in all, it can be said that the sale of goods alone cannot
be regarded as a transfer of an enterprise or a part thereof. What
must also be analysed is whether contracts, and the rights and
obligations of the enterprise, are also handed over with the goods.
The buyer is who is primarily at risk if a transaction is incorrectly qualified. What must be kept in mind is if the buyer believes that they are buying goods, but the tax authority reclassifies the transaction as the transfer of an enterprise, then the buyer does not have the right to reclaim the input VAT shown on the invoice from the state. Also, every buyer will also receive potential obligations with the goods.
Once per month we will send you an article keeping you up to date with the latest trends and developments in accounting, taxation or legal fields.