The
Court has ruled that improper accountancy is equated to large carelessness,
i.e. such acting does not correspond nor to careful, neither to circumspect
behavior standards of the
Director.
The
Court has noted that it is necessary to identify the nature of the duties
breached by the
Director
of the Company in order to decide upon the sort of the
responsibility to be applied to him:
·
provided
that the
Director
causes damages to Company by breaching the duties of employee
of the Company appointed to him, the material responsibility is being applied
to the
Director
according to the Labour Law. This responsibility is limited by
the amounts and order established by the regulation of Labour Law;
·
provided
the
Director
acts dishonestly, improperly manages the accountancy etc. or
breaches the duties of the
Director
established by the specific laws, the civil
liability is being applied to him.
The
Court has ascertained in this case that civil liability is being applied to the
Director
for improper accountancy,
therefore the
Director
shall recover losses suffered by the Company due to such
acts.
11.05.17
Latest articles
22
Feb
15
Jun
2
Jun
We will send you articles keeping you up to date with the latest trends and developments in accounting, taxation or legal fields.